still the same, we are still the same
still the same, we are still the same
ik ging geen afscheid nemen zonder nog 1 keer te overlopen wat de afgelopen 10 jaar via Belsec werd uitgevoerd en al dan niet verwezenlijkt of aangepakt en wat de belangrijkste strijdpunten zijn en blijven.
Zonder statuut of bescherming van securityresearchers zelfs als bloggers is het de laatste maanden steeds moeilijker geworden om zonder kleerscheuren dit soort activiteit te blijven voortdoen. Na 10 jaar inzet werd het dan ook tijd om dit soort stress en risico's aan me te laten voorbijgaan.
De Financieel Economische Tijd van morgen.
hopelijk iets dat de discussie zal kunnen voeden
It is easy to say that and to look like the big defender of press freedom and the freedom of speech but it is another thing to do it and to withstand the pressure, threats and insinuations
I cried for the people of Charlie Hebdo, a paper I have known and loved and with which we grew up and even if we didn't read it or didn't always agree with it we were happy to see that it was still there
The editor - who was the main target - said he didn't care what happened to him because he didn't have a mortgage, money or a family to care for. He just lived for his paper and his work and thoughts and those of others. This gave him an enormous freedom and you see by the reactions of other papers and press agencies that not everybody has that freedom or that courage.
So after ten years in which we several times had professional threats, lawyers and were just walking on a rope between two buildings without a safety net, being confronted with a psychological operation against me because some-one out there thought that this was the way to get to my sources.
And even than as a blogger I was not protected as journalists are against lawsuits, as a security-activists I had only the relationships of trust and confidence with the different people I was working with but there was no formal statue or procedure, I was totally on my own
All those years, we just kept going, sometimes retreating to protect ourselves or our sources (because people are always more important thatn 'causes') or myself.
I thought that I had to be more afraid of amateurs than of professionals because you never know what they want to do next and how they are going to try to execute it. The attack on Charlie Hebdo is clearly the work of amateurs that were maybe well trained in the military execution of a firefight but not in the preparation of an operation.
So the closing down of this blog and more specificially the Belsec operations and .be monitoring and the actions with the cert, privacycommission and other institutions is a virtual death which is so little compared to the carnage in Paris.
So the question is not how can we find the attackers, keep Charlie Hebdo going and protect our official media against such attacks, but how can we extend the rights of investigation and publication in all the media platforms - officially recognized or not.
this is NOT an infosecurityblog it is a security-risk-war blog of which infosecurity is only a small part (and not even necessarily important)
we are NOT watching the Belgian internet for leaks and vulnerabilities anymore, this is the job of the state and the state has to do its work as it has to
this is just some observations, links and informations I share while I am reading
and this only because i am so bored reading the belgian press - sorry guys (but I know you don't have the resources and space you need to make reading belgian press more interesting)
have patience with closing down this blog and service
and moving over to the other one
if you are in belgium and interested about belgian infosecurity we are closing with a bang and if you thought that the presentations on tv and radio and in the press were a bang
await the final exclusive interview about 10 years of fighting for a more secure belgian internet
gloves are off
the archives will be coming online in the coming weeks
all this work will be finished by the end of january - stay on this blog
we have stopped
monitoring pastebin for belgian leaks
monitoring zone-h for belgian hacks
monitoring securityreports for belgian insecurity or compromised sites
monitoring the belgian web with googledorks for insecurity and unresponsable datacollection
we will just be reading and analyzing and thinking and having fun
we can't publish the link due to harrassment by lawyers of Mensura but you can find it easily if you are a little webwise (which shows how stupid these lawyers are)
it also shows what I have said on tv - once on the web always somewhere on the web
so the banks, paypal and others should have taken already all the dispositions to protect the people
new are the old ones of buyway.be (you know that nobody is responsable for overseeing the security and their financial balances of online creditcompanies in Belgium - NO ONE)
1. my sources will stay online and may stay updated
the netvibes are a few hundred RSS feeds
the diigo are a nearly 200.000 links of which we will be liberating a few thousand that will be liberated in the coming days - they were private awaiting treatment
the lists with leaks and insecure belgium are a nice list of leaked data and insecure belgium sites that were hacked or are hackable - if you like to read than you should look at the list documents
the torguide is one of the best around
the twitterlist of leaks and other sources are a nice collection to start with
in January we will close down the following older blogs insecure.skynetblogs.be, scams.skynetblogs.be be-hacked.skynetblogs.be - we will place here the links to the pdf archives and others
2. I thank everybody for the support and I thank those who have enough trust in me to understand that I have always been truthful and that the only way to work with sources and contacts is by being totally open about your intentions and the information you have and I won't change that
3. in january I will help with some of the biggest breakthroughs in the fight for privacy in Belgium of the latest 10 years. But not in the limelight
4. meanwhile we are sliding to 2015 and we can only hope that it may only become better because it can't get worse with cybersecurity in Belgium than has been 2014
Some people have been playing a trick on me and my family
this is not worth it
you don't play with my family
after ten years, I have done enough
I have also a life
and other priorities
It is for the state to invest and to do its work
not me and surely not against my family
and a happy 2015
I am not coming back. Not this time
just to make some things clear
* I never hacked, I don't know hackers and I am not Rex Mundi, never was and I don't know who he is
* I am open for new opportunities or possibilities to work for a safer internet or network somewhere - only serious offers this time - but this blog will not be updated again but we will update through this post about the clean-up actions and what we will make or not make available
* I am available for other freelance work
what is the scenario they are doing all those exercises for ?
situation getting more nervous and dangerous in that region every week
when I started on the internet I had lists with IP numbers of servers on a page
dns and domainnames only came later
the copyrightholders want to go back to that
they want to marginalize copyrightinfringing sites like that
but it can bring down one of the most essential parts of the internet as we know it today
"The MPAA’s legal argument centers on the claim that DNS records are working as an index or directory rather than simply routing data. If that argument holds, then the DNS links could be vulnerable to the same takedown notices used to strike torrent links from Google searches. The net effect would be similar to site-blocking, making it as easy to unplug a URL as it is to take down a YouTube video. It would also cast DNS providers as legally responsible for all the sites on the web, the same way YouTube is responsible for every video uploaded to its network. For many providers, simply managing the flood of notices might create a logistical nightmare.
why Russia thinks it can bully its borderstates militarily
into becoming a member of their socalled security alliance
in which you see why Ukraine is the missing domino as are uzbekistan, Georgia and azerajan
while trying to keep them from joining NATO
and also here you will that the whole geopolitical map changes when Ukraine joins NATO or is linked to it
because if you are linked to it, you are linked to the US and the US has the biggest military machine (even if it doesn't want to use it so massively as it did several times)
and you don't have to be afraid anymore of all those Russian troops at your border because there is a much greater and better shield once they begin to understand that that is necessary to keep the peace - even a cold war peace
and luckily Putin is doing is utter best the last year to convince even the most outspoken defenders of appeasement that it won't work and that Putin is clearly looking for a fight somewhere - the only question is where and when
it means that if this continues trust in anything Russian will be gone - this is the speed with which things can change - as we have seen in 2008 here during the financial crisis - wednesday you were still a major bank and on friday you were broke
sorry guys if you are still living in dreamland but it is time the hard reality begins to settle in
"I wish I was exaggerating, but I’m not. The Ohio Replacement Program was conceived to modernize the sea-based part of the nation’s nuclear force — the only part of that force that is certain to survive if Russia, China or some other major nuclear power launches a surprise attack in, say, 2050. The reason why is that the Navy’s ballistic-missile subs patrol silently beneath the surface of the world’s oceans, where enemies cannot find them; the Air Force’s bombers and silo-based missiles, on the other hand, are in known locations that can be easily targeted
you don't need to put it into writing and even not in a law
that functionality will be in all telecom technology quite soon - because it has been asked by so many not so telco's in not so democratic countries or where this has become standard practice since ever
from the technical documents (you can download withoiut becoming member) https://www.scribd.com/doc/250135436/Public-Safety-ATIP-Telecom-Equipment
the technical information has been blackened so you can't know what these new standarts will be as each of the firms (and one of the heads of Huwai in Belgium told me personally) will say that officially these interception backdoors are NOT in their infrastructure
Huwai is installed in the Belgacom and Telenet networks although some have serious questions about that
well, imagine the passwords of this kind of emailboxes being published on the web and nobody tries to take down the link and so everybody has access to these boxes
this is but one publication but the same team published other leaks also in revenge
and about the takedown
the piratebay said that because they were using 12 virtual servers in 12 different locations it would be impossible to take them down ..... but this is the theory of virtualisation but in reality there is always a mother or a server that takes all the load while the rest just thinks that you will never try to take them down and that they will never need so much power (and keep down the costs)
another thing is that if you work with domainnames than you have to control the dns server and the ip addresses to which they are linked but if you take down one ip address and it is not possible to add another one than you are cooked
taking down infrastructure like this and TOR takes much more time but in the end you will take it down - except as with Wikileaks several years ago thousands of people start serving a copy on their own servers
maybe this is a model for piratebay to follow
"Yesterday, Bloomberg News reported that hackers, likely from Russia, caused a 2008 explosion on the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline in Turkey. According to Bloomberg, the BTC pipeline attack “Opened [a] New Cyberwar Era,” two years before the Stuxnet worm derailed Iranian nuclear centrifuges. The report is significant because it moves back the timeline for alleged state-sponsored cyber attacks that caused destruction in the physical world. (I use “attack” throughout this post in the colloquial sense, without reference to whether an “attack” is an “armed attack” for purposes of international law.)
But the pipeline explosion report also highlights another important issue. It took six years for the explosion to be publicly revealed as a cyber attack, and confusion about whether an incident is an accident or a cyber attack may be a common problem going forward. Although lot of attention focuses on cybersecurity attribution as a question of who carried out an intrusion, the BTC explosion exemplifies an analytically prior attribution question: what caused an incident, a cyber attack or a simple malfunction?http://justsecurity.org/18334/cyber-attribution-problems-not-who/
and so if people get the right to respond immediately to such a cyberattack, the chance that they will be responding to the wrong country and are falling into a second trap is much bigger than anybody realises
in the US there is even talk of responding with military attacks
the article shows some interesting things.
First it was said that these agreements were so secret that they were hardly communicated about in PWC but here we have some-one who had access to them in a database and was not implemented in setting them up becasue he was disgusted by them.
Secondly he took them with him when he left the firm (like Snowden) but nobody checked what he did, what he knew and what he took with him, even if there were documents that were considered highly secret
third he lost control over the documents and who got them and who did something with them just as Snowden lost control over his documents in which parts are going around the world
fourth there are others and they are hunting them down, one after another and I only hope for them that those who have used the documents have found all the obvious and secret indicators that will facilitate their job (one stupid but efficient trick is to change a letter in each copy)