#ukraine US gives itself the legal possibilities to intervene and help the attacked eastern front states
so you are not alone and if it comes to that the US president and the military have the legal and democratic powers to intervene while the NATO can intensify their links and decide if it comes to that what they will or can do
the bill itself : https://t.co/hWDalmQQhm
this says something about the universality of information and the correctness of information because it is not disputed legally, it is still legally part of Ukraine, point final
once you start departing from that point of view you are creating problems with no return
at the time it was the US who was thinking and planning a limited nuclear war in Europe (Reagan and Haig and so)
now it is Putin who is sending nuclear missiles to Crimea, the Baltic region and before our coasts (submarines) and along our borders in planes
it are the Russian troops shooting every day to kill in Ukraine, having already killed already thousands of people and not willing to abide by any peace agreement or diplomatic solution
it is in Moscow that people are parading with posters of Stalin, responsable for the deportation of 17 million people to the Gulag and nobody really knew how many millions died during the Big purge
it is Putin that is speaking in terms of war time and time again and Obama who is looking more and more like Roosevelt was treating Stalin (like a friendly Puppy he could handle personally while Churchill didn't trust Stalin a second)
so there may be some peace movements and demonstrations but they will be dubious (Marie Le Pen may even participate) and they won't be understood in the eastern memberstates of the EU and NATO. Well, you will also have the people who are always against the US whatever it is doing and do not want to know anything wrong about Russia because that is all propaganda
For the moment there are about 800 russian missiles targeting Europe with a madman holding the button
the day the first missiles land, don't be surprised that the situation will degrade quite quickly and that US troops will follow fast afterwards - except if Putin is brought back to his senses and stops this circus of military provocations and incursions and undercover destabilisation operations
that is what friends are for
or also the proof that Russia is a cooperation, nothing more
source (where there is more) http://globalvoicesonline.org/2014/12/10/russias-anonymous-international-promises-new-wave-of-leaks/
and they have understood what Putin has said from the beginning
it is about (anti)tanks - not airplanes or longdistance missiles - but tanks and troops
so what do you buy to defend against such an enemy ?
All US tanks have left the European Continent in 2013 although there are plans to send some back soon or they should lease them to the frontier states in the east
in this tweet you see how many Russian troops there are in Kalingrad next to Lithuania - also re-arming themselves and the US starting to send some troops and planes
the situation is becoming more nervous in the Baltic region the last week as the NATO has seen different Russian troop movements in Kalingrad and along the Baltic states increasing the tension
"The former Soviet Union president further said Russia had experienced difficult times after the Soviet Union's collapse and the U.S. had taken advantage of it. Gorbachev said but today was different because Russia is well-armed. He mentioned that it was good to see Russian President Vladimir Putin taking care of security, strengthening the military and developing weapons. He has no doubt that if anything happens, Russia can "hit back." http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/574603/20141202/russia-gor...
not much different from what Putin is saying
maybe he is afraid of his status and his pension in this virtual democracy in Russia (it seems it is there, but it isn't, like with the virtual environment you only have to pull the cable out to end it all)
they are being stolen
not sure if this is a scam or not but it is being advertised
it is a known as a fact since long time that torture does only very rarely bring real information
just reading a book about the Great purges under Staline (nothing Great among them)
but sometimes people just don't want to listen to real specialists who will tell you that it won't work with people who are really convinced of their case and willing to die for it and that other people will just invent thing only to make you stop
the airtraffic over baltic where tensions are increasing daily now http://www.flightradar24.com/RYR75LM/500f160
"It wouldn’t be the least bit surprising to see the best bits of Bitcoin be grafted into new products and services (like facilitating international transfers),” said David Yermack, professor of finance at New York University Stern School of Business, to CNN.
“A lot of the breakthrough products tend to get taken over pretty quickly by improved versions and I think that’s likely going to be the fate of Bitcoin. It’s certainly played a role in raising issues and opening possibilities that people were only dimly aware of before. But if I owned Bitcoins, I would be a seller at the current market price as I think a year from now they may be all but worthless.”
first they seem to forget that some - even essential parts - of bitcoin (like for example the encryption) seem to have some fundamental logical mistakes which makes it insecure an sich. So incorporating parts of bitcoin into new digital currencies that are part of the normal financial systems can introduce some grave mistakes into the normal financial system.
secondly the biggest advantage of Bitcoin is that it is anonymous but governments all over the world are trying to limit the anonimity of money transfers because they want to receive the right amount of due taxes. So this fundamental part of bitcoin won't ever be incorporated without a backdoor for tax and law agencies. It will also be much easier to follow digital currencies through their CHAIN if there is such a backdoor than with our present ways of paying.
and last but not least
bitcoin has shown what the internet have shown in so many other industries and that is that if there is an unfair interference from businesses in a normal process it can and will be replaced by an internetbased direct system. It costs much too much to transfer money around the world - and even across accounts. But I don't see the bitcoin replace the dollar as an international currency. It will be much easier to have a 'digital dollar' with the possibilities of a digital bitcoin than a bitcoin with the financial trust of the dollar.
there will always be anonymous digital currencies because there is a reason for them to exist and if you use them for that reason (to give anonymously to support causes by example) whatever the value of the bitcoin at any moment. But it will never become a real investment product (except as pure speculation with the risk of losing nearly everything) because it is insecure, prosecuted by law agencies and not supported by any financial institution.
if you use bitcoin, use it to do something with the same value you have bought it
let's hope that this will foce Putin to come back to his senses
this has only any sense if somebody who knows the russian language makes sense out of it all and translates it in english
just as anybody else in the intelligence business I think
more can be found here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAXdfFRi-lhKqlKV1JLSCsQ
somebody is increasing the gamble looking how far he can go